For founders and B2B teams sitting on complex content — frameworks, assessments, research, decks — I build the structure, the interface, and increasingly the product itself.
The thinking is sound. The delivery buries it.
Clear hierarchy, a logic that guides the reader — ready to use, not just nice to look at.
The front-end of AI-powered tools, product dashboards, and multi-page interactive reports. I take structural thinking and turn it into something people use, not just read — designed to ship.
Sales decks, board and investor presentations, proposals, executive slide systems. Clean hierarchy, strong layout logic, a narrative that works in the room — not just on the screen.
Branded report layouts, structured PDF assessments, whitepapers, and editorial systems. Where dense content needs a backbone — sections, flow, and a visual language that scales.
Selected work · 2024–2026
Lead product, sales, and editorial design for FITT16 — a personality & team-effectiveness framework. Each format solved a different translation problem.
01 · Product · 2026
A long-form static assessment, rebuilt as a product: a multi-page interactive report, an AI companion tuned to each person, and a coach platform for running it across teams.
Read case study →02 · Sales · 2026
A modular B2B sales narrative for an unfamiliar framework. A six-act structure and a visual system that holds whether the meeting runs fifteen minutes or sixty.
Read case study →03 · Editorial · 2025
An assessment output redesigned as an object worth keeping. Editorial typography and pacing turn raw results into something a reader returns to.
Read case study →01 · Product · 2026 · Lead designer & front-end
Structured, personalized coaching used to need a human in the room for every person. The FITT16 Dashboard makes it daily, personal, and scalable — an interactive report, an AI companion tuned to each individual, and a coach platform for running it across teams. Without the dark patterns that make "daily" apps exhausting.
FITT16 is a personality framework built on serious thinking. It lived as a static, long-form PDF report — the content was right, but it was trapped. People took the assessment, read the report once, and never came back.
Structured, personalized coaching has always been powerful, and always been expensive: it needed a human expert for every individual, which capped who could reach it. FITT16's technology changes that economics. My job was to design the interface that delivers it — not a prettier assessment, but a product people would return to, and a platform a coach could run across a whole roster.
The first decision was the smallest and the most consequential: what is one "use" of this product? A feed asks you to keep scrolling. A dashboard asks you to scan and triage. Neither fits something you open between meetings to think for ninety seconds.
So the dense PDF became a navigable, multi-page experience — profile, archetype, personal, professional, and career views the reader moves through, not past. On mobile it's six full-screen cards, one thought at a time. The first card earns the next open: a single, specific observation, and three honest ways forward.
Trade-off: one-thing-at-a-time means lower information density. Resolved with a quiet progress rail, so depth stays visible without rewarding the scroll-anxiety the format was built to avoid.
This is where the product goes furthest. An AI companion, tuned to each person's archetype, turns a static profile into an ongoing conversation — the depth of a coaching session, available any time, at a fraction of the cost. It's the piece that makes personalized coaching actually scalable.
The design problem was making it feel like a coach who knows you, not a chatbot. It opens already tuned to your profile, never from a blank box. It remembers what you raised last week and brings it back when it's relevant — not on a schedule. It offers three distinct voices to think with — the Mirror, the Thinking Partner, and the Guide — because the same person needs reflection some days and challenge on others. On the days that need nothing, the last card is a quiet close. No streaks, no badges, no chase.
How AI shaped the build: the voice system was developed by generating and pressure-testing hundreds of tone variants against real archetype profiles, then refining by hand — iterated the way you'd iterate a design system. It's how a three-voice companion shipped on a timeline that would normally allow one.
A coaching product has two people in it: the individual reflecting, and the coach guiding many of them. They need different things from the same data — the individual needs depth and one clear next step; the coach needs pattern, comparison, and the ability to act across a roster.
Rather than build two products, I built one design language with two compositions. The coach platform — access-code commerce, cohort management, organisation and archetype filtering — is a re-composition of the same parts, not a separate system. One coach, many people, structured access: the mechanism that turns expensive one-to-one coaching into something that scales.
Trade-off: serving two audiences doubles the surface area. A shared component system kept it maintainable and kept both views feeling like one product — built to extend as FITT16 grows.
The two surfaces aren't one layout at different widths — they do different jobs. Desktop is where someone goes deep. Mobile is built for the daily return: one insight, one prompt, one reason to come back. Same system, two rhythms of use.
Some content redacted to respect client confidentiality
02 · Sales · 2026 · Lead designer
A modular B2B sales narrative for an unfamiliar framework — a six-act structure and a visual system that holds whether the meeting runs fifteen minutes or sixty.
This case study is being written in the same structure as the Dashboard: the problem, the decisions, the trade-offs, and the outcome. Check back shortly.
03 · Editorial · 2025 · Lead designer
An assessment output redesigned as an object worth keeping — editorial typography and pacing that turn raw results into something a reader returns to.
This case study is being written in the same structure as the Dashboard. Check back shortly.
— Notes
Short, opinionated, and irregular. What I'm learning while designing AI products and building one of my own.
If removing the AI leaves the product basically intact, you added a feature. The interesting work starts where the product depends on it…
A founder hires me for visuals and is surprised when the first week produces none. Here's what I'm actually doing in that week…
Streaks and badges work, and I won't use them. The harder, better version is making the thing genuinely worth returning to…
— About
Founders and B2B teams hire me when their material is right but not landing: the framework is solid, the research is deep, the offer is real — but it's trapped in a format that buries it. I build the structure around it: the hierarchy, the flow, and increasingly the interface itself.
My background is in structure before surface. Most projects start by rebuilding the underlying logic — what the reader, user, or buyer needs to grasp, in what order, with what proof — before any pixel moves. That part is invisible in the final deliverable, but it's the part that makes the rest work.
I work fastest with AI as a design partner — for iteration, exploration, and pressure-testing structure. It's how I deliver senior-level work on freelance timelines, and increasingly it's the medium itself: the front-end of AI-powered products, not just documents about them.
I work best in small, direct collaborations where clarity is the priority, feedback is specific, and the goal is a deliverable that's ready to use. I don't do branding or illustration — I do the architecture of how your content is understood.
If you've got expertise that deserves to land better than it currently does — a framework, an assessment, a deck, a product — tell me what you're working on. I take on a small number of projects at a time so each gets real depth.
hello@dashas.design →AI products and front-ends, sales decks, and structured reports for founders, consultancies, and framework companies with something genuinely complex to communicate.
Branding, logos, illustration, fast template work, or projects where the brief is "just make it pretty."